When Automation Meets Administration
As artificial intelligence becomes increasingly integrated into our daily lives, it's no longer just transforming industries like healthcare or finance. It's fundamentally altering how people interact with public services—often in ways that are both surprising and profound.
"The vast majority of cases we find are people who are entitled to claim for something, claiming for that thing," said Chris Schmitz, a researcher tracking this phenomenon under the term 'agentic flooding.'
This is not just about spam or bot-generated noise. It's a real and significant shift in how citizens engage with government systems. In the UK alone, complaints to the housing ombudsman nearly doubled after ChatGPT emerged, rising from 2,600 in 2022 to over 7,000 last year. The U.S. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) saw its complaint volume grow by fivefold during the same period. Similar patterns emerged in Brazil and Germany.
The Rise of the Agentic Flood
Chris Schmitz has been documenting this trend through his research, which he describes as "agentic flooding." In a paper set to be presented at the AI Ethics and Society conference, Schmitz analyzed 84 different cases across 11 jurisdictions. His findings reveal a consistent pattern: submissions were relatively flat before 2022 but began rising sharply with the diffusion of AI tools.
What's particularly striking is that this trend shows no signs of slowing down. Schmitz's research points to a structural change in how people approach bureaucratic processes. Where once applicants might have felt overwhelmed by complex forms or lengthy procedures, AI agents now make it possible to navigate these systems with ease.
"People are finding out that this is something one can do, and incrementally, it is just getting easier to do it," Schmitz explained. "Before it might have been a question of a lot of dragging context together and prompting ChatGPT 3.5 very precisely, it may now be a question of just pasting or taking a photo of a letter with your Claude app and getting a pretty good response in one shot."
From Spam to Substance
While some may view this surge as an overload of low-quality submissions, Schmitz offers a more nuanced perspective. He notes that most of the new applications come from people with legitimate claims—people who were previously deterred by administrative burdens.
This is a crucial distinction. In the bug-bounty world, for instance, LLMs have flooded security teams with reports that rarely contain actual vulnerabilities but still consume valuable resources. The situation in public services is different: these are real people seeking real assistance. The sheer volume, however, presents new challenges for service providers who must manage 5x more applicants with the same staffing and budget constraints.
The implications go beyond simple capacity management. If people are now able to access benefits they were previously unable to claim due to complexity or effort, this represents a powerful opportunity for governments to make their services more inclusive and accessible. It's not just about filling forms faster; it's about rethinking the entire process of public service delivery.
Administrative Burden: A Barrier That AI Is Breaking Down
Administrative burden—the effort required to interact with government systems—is a well-documented problem in policy circles. When people find it too difficult or time-consuming to navigate these systems, they often abandon their claims altogether. But as AI agents make the process more intuitive and efficient, that barrier is being removed.
This shift has significant implications for social equity. Citizens who previously lacked the resources or knowledge to pursue benefits are now empowered to do so. It also means that governments must reassess how they design their digital services—not just in terms of functionality, but in terms of accessibility and user experience.
Reimagining Public Services for the AI Era
One of the most compelling aspects of Schmitz's research is his call to see this moment not as a crisis, but as an opportunity. "A big part of making AI go well is being able to detail out what the good version of things looks like," he says. "Anyone who's ever used ChatGPT to do the tax return knows that there's a good version here where you're being helped."
This perspective encourages us to think strategically about how we build and maintain public systems in an age of AI. The goal isn't simply to keep pace with technological change but to proactively design services that can leverage AI's capabilities while ensuring fairness, accountability, and inclusivity.
We're entering a new phase where public service delivery must adapt to become more agile, responsive, and intelligent. That means building systems that are not only easier for citizens to use but also smarter about processing and responding to requests. It requires investment in digital infrastructure, training for staff, and most importantly, a shift in mindset among policymakers who must be willing to embrace innovation rather than resist it.
The Future Is Collaborative
As we look ahead, one thing is clear: the relationship between citizens and public services is evolving. AI agents are not replacing human judgment; they're augmenting it. They provide tools that help people access their rights more easily while freeing up human workers to focus on complex cases and nuanced decisions.
This transformation demands new policies, new training programs, and perhaps most importantly, a recognition that public services must evolve alongside the technology that enables them. The key lies in preparing for this change proactively rather than reactively. By investing now in platforms that are AI-ready, governments can better serve their citizens while maintaining efficiency and integrity.
What we're witnessing is more than a technological revolution—it's a societal one. And it's up to us to ensure that the future of public services reflects not just our ability to adapt, but our commitment to making those adaptations meaningful for everyone.
The Challenge Ahead
Of course, the road ahead is not without obstacles. Ensuring quality control, preventing abuse, and managing increased demand are all challenges that governments must face head-on. But by approaching these issues with a clear-eyed understanding of both the opportunities and risks, policymakers can begin to build systems that truly meet the needs of modern society.
For now, one thing is certain: AI agents are not just changing how we file complaints—they're changing how we think about access, inclusion, and participation in public life. It's a moment that calls for bold leadership and smart policy-making, guided by the principles of transparency, equity, and human-centered design.
- Public services must evolve to accommodate AI-assisted interactions
- The administrative burden of accessing benefits is being reduced through AI tools
- Governments need to invest in digital infrastructure that supports both citizen engagement and efficient processing
- This transformation presents an opportunity for more inclusive and effective public service delivery
Key Facts
- Primary Entity: Chris Schmitz
- Research Focus: Agentic flooding in public services
- Study Period: Before 2022 to present
- Number of Cases Analyzed: 84 cases across 11 jurisdictions
- Complaint Volume Increase in US: Fivefold increase in CFPB complaints
- Complaint Volume Increase in UK: More than doubled housing ombudsman complaints
- Key Finding: AI tools are reducing administrative burden for citizens
- Term Coined: Agentic flooding
Background
Chris Schmitz is a researcher who has been tracking how artificial intelligence agents are fundamentally changing how people interact with public services. His research, which he calls 'agentic flooding,' examines the pattern of increased applications and complaints to government systems following the widespread adoption of AI tools. This phenomenon has led to significant spikes in requests across multiple countries including the United Kingdom, United States, Brazil, and Germany.
Quick Answers
- Who is Chris Schmitz?
- Chris Schmitz is a researcher who tracks how artificial intelligence agents are changing public service interactions. He coined the term 'agentic flooding' to describe this phenomenon.
- What is agentic flooding?
- Agentic flooding is a term coined by Chris Schmitz that describes the surge in applications and complaints to public services following widespread AI tool adoption.
- When did agentic flooding begin?
- Agentic flooding began rising sharply with the diffusion of AI tools, particularly after 2022 when ChatGPT emerged.
- What is the impact on public services?
- Public services are experiencing unprecedented spikes in requests, with some seeing fivefold increases in complaints and doubled housing ombudsman filings.
- How does AI affect administrative burden?
- AI agents make it easier for citizens to navigate complex bureaucratic processes, effectively reducing the administrative burden that previously deterred people from claiming benefits.
- What are the key findings from Schmitz's research?
- Schmitz found that submissions were relatively flat before 2022 but began rising sharply with AI diffusion, and this trend shows no signs of slowing down.
- What percentage increase occurred in UK housing complaints?
- Complaints to the UK housing ombudsman more than doubled, rising from 2,600 in 2022 to over 7,000 last year.
- What is the significance of this research?
- Schmitz's research indicates that AI is enabling people to access benefits they were previously unable to claim due to complexity or effort, presenting an opportunity for more inclusive public service delivery.
Frequently Asked Questions
What caused the increase in public service requests?
The increase is attributed to AI tools making it easier for people to file claims and complaints, reducing administrative barriers that previously deterred applicants.
How many cases did Chris Schmitz analyze?
Chris Schmitz analyzed 84 different cases across 11 jurisdictions in his research on agentic flooding.
What does the term 'agentic flooding' mean?
Agentic flooding refers to the phenomenon where AI agents are flooding public services with new requests, filings, and complaints as these tools make accessing government systems easier.
How has this affected the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau?
The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau saw its complaint volume grow by fivefold during the same period that AI tools became widely available.
Source reference: https://techcrunch.com/2026/09/10/ai-agents-are-flooding-public-services-with-new-requests/





Comments
Sign in to leave a comment
Sign InLoading comments...