Newsclip — Social News Discovery

Editorial

Beyond Trump: The Central Role of Energy in Global Power Struggles

January 27, 2026
  • #GlobalPolitics
  • #EnergyResources
  • #Geopolitics
  • #PowerStruggles
  • #Trump
Share on XShare on FacebookShare on LinkedIn
Beyond Trump: The Central Role of Energy in Global Power Struggles

The Evolving Landscape of Power: A Deeper Look

In 2026, just a few short years after President Trump's previous reign, the fabric of global politics is fraying at the seams. It might be tempting to attribute this unraveling solely to one person or administration, but the reality is that a greater struggle is unfolding — one deeply rooted in energy resources.

Helen Thompson, a political economist at Cambridge and author of Disorder: Hard Times in the 21st Century, highlights how tumult was brewing long before Trump assumed office. The chaos has only intensified, marking profound shifts in international relations.

The Underpinnings of Chaos

Thompson identifies 2005 as a critical year, the moment where various geopolitical fault lines became evident — from NATO's division over the Iraq invasion to significant energy dependency shifts in Europe. The stagnation of oil production met an insatiable Asian demand, especially from China, and this clash foreshadowed tensions that have escalated in the years since.

By 2026, we find ourselves in a world where the United States, China, and Russia are not merely competing for territory or influence but are locked in a fierce battle for energy control. This fight is not just about economic power; it is about national security and the very foundations of our global order.

The Energy Factor

“In my view, the competition for, and control of, energy resources remains central to global politics,” Thompson asserts. The this premise is bolstered by historical evidence that suggests the geopolitical narratives of the 20th and 21st centuries echo one another in alarming ways. “Understanding the United States' ascendant global power requires recognizing the seismic impact of its shale boom,” she continues.

As Europe turns increasingly toward the U.S. for energy post-Russia's invasion of Ukraine, the implications for existing alliances and dependencies grow clearer — and more precarious.

The Geopolitical Nexus: Energy, Politics, and National Identity

  • U.S.-China Dynamics: The rivalry fundamentally pivots on technological competition interlinked with energy access.
  • Russia's Role: As an energy supplier, Russia remains a crucial competitor, complicating the broader narrative.
  • The Environmental Conundrum: Even in a world shifting toward renewable energy, reliance on oil persists due to its economic necessity.

Looking Forward: Energy as Geopolitical Leverage

The transactional nature of energy diplomacy has engendered a new kind of geopolitics where nations wield energy access like a weapon. “The U.S. willingness under Trump to press European states to purchase American gas serves as a paradigm shift in Western energy dependence,” Thompson notes.

But what does this mean for smaller nations caught in the crossfire of major powers? Will there be opportunities for middle powers to align strategically, or will the landscape be defined solely by resource competition? Drawing on historical precedents, one can argue that alliances are both necessary and increasingly complex in today's multipolar world.

The Bigger Picture: Is There Hope for Stability?

What intrigues me is this: can periods of interdependence develop into stable relationships or unravel into conflict? Historical examples yield mixed outcomes. Europe's post-World War II integration attempts serve as a testament that strategic cooperation around shared resources can forestall perilous rivalries. However, current dynamics suggest a return to competitive nationalism may be the new status quo.

Conclusion: Deciphering the Future

In sum, our understanding of international relations must evolve to incorporate the historical and material concrete realities of energy dependencies. As we track the trajectory of global politics, the significance of energy resources in fueling rivalries and alliances is undeniable. We are left to ponder: how will these forces shape the future of our world? Engagement in dialogue is not just encouraged; it is essential.

As Thompson eloquently encapsulates, the geopolitical landscape is transformed, yet our foundational assumptions about energy and power remain unchallenged. The time has come for us to rethink the narratives we accept — before it's too late.

Source reference: https://www.nytimes.com/2026/01/27/opinion/trump-oil-global-politics.html

More from Editorial