The Rise of Candace Owens
In a striking convergence of tragedy and conspiracy, the recent meeting between Erika Kirk and Candace Owens exemplifies the surreal landscape of today's conservative movement. While most leaders would use a tragic event—like the assassination of Charlie Kirk—to unite their ranks, Owens has managed to twist this narrative into a playground for conspiratorial thought, pushing the boundaries of logic and accountability.
“Owens had on her show a man who claimed to have seen Erika Kirk at an army base the day before Kirk's assassination.”
The implications of such allegations are serious, yet they continue to thrive within a media ecosystem that rewards sensationalism over substantive discussion. As Erika Kirk seeks answers and closure, Owens thrives on chaos, turning the suffering of individuals into fodder for her brand of influencer politics.
A Divided Right
Erika's pilgrimage to Nashville, orchestrated by Megyn Kelly, was supposed to serve as a plea to Owens to cease her reckless discourse. However, the summit reveals a deeper issue: Owens is far too influential, and attempts to rein her in have proven futile. Kelly, a figure who once stood for conservative norms, has also failed to denounce Owens, further catalyzing the internal strife.
Ben Shapiro lamented the transformation of the conservative movement in his recent address, citing both external and internal threats. The monarchy of traditional conservatism is crumbling under the weight of extremist rhetoric championed by influencers like Owens, who has rooted her place within this fractured system despite past ties to key organizations like Turning Point.
“Today the conservative movement is in serious danger, not just from the left, but from charlatans,” Shapiro warned.
Dangerous Influencer Politics
This situation begs a crucial question: What happens when a movement creates a monster it can't control? Owens is emblematic of this phenomenon—eloquent yet dangerously unhinged, she encapsulates the shifting dynamics of how conservative narratives are formed, disseminated, and consumed. Not only has she captured the attention of devoted political junkies, but her reach extends far and wide, permeating platforms like TikTok where her videos garner millions of views.
The algorithmic world of social media prioritizes sensationalism, leaning towards content that promises 'hidden truths' over factual reporting. As information consumers, we must question the consequences of algorithms amplifying voices that espouse unfounded claims at the expense of communal trust and accountability.
The Pitfalls of Participation
Owens has shown a remarkable ability to draw in followers by packaging her conspiracy theories within the conventions of true crime narrative styles, a development that should alarm any serious thinker. This blend of entertainment and misinformation leads her audience to feel like participants in a grand psychological game, booby-trapped with untested assumptions and biased conclusions.
“Just asking questions does not equate to truth, nor does it lead to improvement in our lives.” - Ben Shapiro
This sensationalism spills over from politics into the personal, creating a culture of distrust where conspiratorial thinking thrives. Owens' portrayal of Zionists as sinister masterminds or the scapegoat for various societal ills echoes long-standing prejudices and incites discord.
A Deteriorating Trust
It's crucial to recognize that the focus on conspiracies distracts us from real issues affecting everyday lives. As political figures like Shapiro speak out, they too wrestle with the efficacy of their dissent. Unable to excommunicate Owens or curtail her influence, the hegemony of traditional conservatism appears increasingly tenuous.
Owens represents a revealing paradox: her success showcases the entrepreneurial spirit of right-wing voices, yet each conspiracy she spins further erodes the foundation on which valid conservative discourse stands. Can the right reclaim its identity in the face of such divisiveness?
The Path Forward
Ultimately, the conservative movement must confront its own contradictions and ask how it arrived at this chaotic juncture. A unified front can only be built through accountability rather than sensationalism; embracing a future rooted in truth is the only way to ensure a sustainable legacy. The time has come for leaders to prioritize civic responsibility over influencers who prioritize clicks.
As we have seen in the aftermath of tragic events like Charlie Kirk's assassination, the need for integrity in representation is paramount. Is it too late for conservative leaders to regain control of their narrative, or have they already given the steering wheel to a figure like Owens?
Conclusion
Owens' trajectory is not merely a tale of individual ascent but a reflection of the broader crises within the conservative movement. It exposes vulnerabilities that, if left unaddressed, will continue to diminish trust in political discourse. To rise above, leaders must take a hard look in the mirror and decide whether they will embrace truth for the sake of unity or capitulate further to the chaos that breeds division.
Source reference: https://www.nytimes.com/2025/12/20/opinion/candace-owens-erika-kirk.html




