Care as Economic Infrastructure
For too long, society has treated care as a family responsibility rather than an essential part of economic infrastructure. This assumption has cost us dearly — not just in human suffering but in lost productivity, reduced workforce participation, and diminished economic potential.
The International Labour Organization estimates that 748 million people were outside the global labor force in 2023 due to care responsibilities, with 708 million of them women. This is not just about gender inequality — it's about economic inefficiency.
As someone who has spent years working in global health and development, I've seen firsthand how inadequate access to care creates a cascade of economic consequences. When people can't get the care they need, families are forced to absorb that responsibility — often at great personal cost.
The Hidden Cost of Vision Impairment
Consider vision impairment, one of the most common yet preventable health issues. According to the World Health Organization, at least one billion people globally have vision problems that could be addressed with existing solutions. The annual global productivity loss attributed to this condition is estimated at $411 billion.
This figure only tells part of the story. It doesn't capture how families are forced to sacrifice careers, children are left without proper schooling, and communities lose out on potential contributions when basic care isn't accessible.
When Health Needs Become Family Burdens
What starts as a health need can quickly become a caregiving burden. For example, an elderly person with poor eyesight might no longer be able to shop independently or prepare meals safely. A family member — often a woman — steps in to provide support.
This pattern repeats across all forms of care. When affordable childcare isn't available, parents can't maintain steady employment. When long-term care is inaccessible, families must take on those roles themselves. And when health services are too expensive or distant, conditions that could have been treated early become long-term dependencies.
Building a System for Sustainable Care
I've seen how powerful it can be when communities are supported with robust care systems. In underserved areas, the same interventions — such as basic eye care — are available and affordable, yet people still lack access due to distance, cost, or awareness.
That's why we must shift our approach. Care isn't a luxury or a personal choice; it's infrastructure. We need to invest in systems that make care accessible, affordable, and sustainable — not just for individuals but for the broader economy.
Investing in Economic Resilience
We must recognize that investing in care creates economic value. It supports families, strengthens workforces, and enhances productivity. It allows parents to stay employed, children to thrive in school, and older adults to remain independent.
This requires a fundamental rethinking of how we plan our economies. We need to integrate care into public policy as a strategic investment — not an afterthought. Governments should invest in community-based services, reduce financial barriers, strengthen local workforces, and raise awareness about available resources.
Technology and Human Connection
Technology can play a vital role here too. Digital tools can improve coordination between patients and providers, help identify underserved communities, and support ongoing care management. But we must ensure that these innovations enhance — rather than replace — human relationships in care.
The goal is not to digitize everything but to make care more efficient and accessible while maintaining the personal touch that makes it effective.
A Shared Economic Responsibility
We also need better economic measurement. Traditional indicators like GDP don't capture the value of unpaid care or the productivity gains that come from accessible healthcare systems. We must develop metrics that reflect how care contributes to economic health — both for individuals and society as a whole.
The path forward requires collaboration between governments, employers, investors, and communities. It's time to treat care not just as something we do for others but as a strategic investment in our collective future.
When we finally see care for what it truly is — an economic necessity — we unlock opportunities for growth, resilience, and prosperity. That's not just idealism; it's economic reality.
Key Facts
- Global labor force participation affected by care responsibilities: 748 million people were outside the global labor force in 2023 due to care responsibilities, according to the International Labour Organization
- Women disproportionately affected by care responsibilities: Of the 748 million people outside the global labor force due to care responsibilities in 2023, 708 million were women
- Annual global productivity loss from vision impairment: $411 billion annually
- People with vision impairment who need eyeglasses but lack access: Two out of three people in low-income countries who need eyeglasses do not have access to them, according to the World Health Organization
Background
Care is often treated as a family responsibility rather than an essential part of economic infrastructure. This assumption has significant economic consequences, including reduced workforce participation and diminished economic potential. The article argues that care should be recognized as economic infrastructure, similar to roads, electricity, and digital networks. When people cannot access the care they need, families absorb that responsibility, often at great personal cost. The author, Kate Moynihan, emphasizes that investing in accessible care systems strengthens households, supports workforce participation, and enhances productivity.
Quick Answers
- Who is Kate Moynihan?
- Kate Moynihan is the CEO and executive director of Seva Foundation, where she leads global efforts to expand access to sustainable eye care systems in underserved communities.
- What happened to care as economic infrastructure?
- Care has been treated as a family responsibility rather than an essential part of economic infrastructure, leading to reduced workforce participation and diminished economic potential.
- Why is care considered economic infrastructure?
- Care helps people remain healthy, independent, educated, and able to participate in economic life, similar to roads, electricity, and digital networks.
- How much global productivity is lost due to vision impairment?
- The annual global productivity loss attributed to vision impairment is estimated at $411 billion.
- What is the ILO's position on care economy?
- The International Labour Organization defines the care economy as encompassing paid and unpaid work across households, public institutions, private organizations, and communities.
- What are the consequences of inadequate access to care?
- Inadequate access to care creates a cascade of economic consequences including reduced workforce participation, lost productivity, and diminished economic potential.
- How does vision impairment affect economic productivity?
- Vision impairment affects economic productivity by creating substantial annual global productivity losses estimated at $411 billion.
- What is the impact of care responsibilities on women?
- Care responsibilities disproportionately affect women, with 708 million women out of the global labor force in 2023 due to such responsibilities.
Frequently Asked Questions
Why is care infrastructure important for economic development?
Care infrastructure is essential because it helps people remain healthy, independent, educated, and able to participate in economic life. This supports workforce participation and enhances productivity.
What role does the World Health Organization play in vision impairment data?
The World Health Organization estimates that at least one billion people globally have vision problems that could be addressed with existing solutions, and its data shows that two out of three people in low-income countries who need eyeglasses do not have access to them.
How does inadequate care affect families?
Inadequate care forces families to absorb the responsibility of providing support, often at great personal cost. When basic care isn't accessible, families must sacrifice careers, children are left without proper schooling, and communities lose potential contributions.
What solutions does the article propose for improving access to care?
The article proposes investing in community-based services, reducing financial barriers, strengthening local workforces, improving public awareness, and using technology to improve coordination and identification of underserved communities.
Source reference: https://www.newsweek.com/care-economic-necessity-not-just-family-responsibility-opinion-12421260




Comments
Sign in to leave a comment
Sign InLoading comments...