Denmark's Sovereignty & Arctic Security: A Call for Respect in NATO
As I sit in Denmark's Parliament, I feel a deep sense of urgency amid the ongoing geopolitical tension surrounding Greenland—a territory integral to both Denmark's identity and NATO's security strategy. Recent statements from U.S. officials claiming Greenland should be part of the United States have rattled our understanding of allyship and sovereignty.
U.S. White House adviser Stephen Miller recently asserted that the formal position of the U.S. government under President Trump is that Greenland should belong to America. This claim represents not only a misunderstanding of international relations but also a reckless disregard for the principles of mutual respect that underpin our NATO alliance. We must address these claims with the seriousness they deserve.
"For one ally to claim ownership over the territory of another is not just provocative; it undermines the very foundations of democracy and self-determination." — Naomi Fletcher
Every country involved in NATO must acknowledge not just the strategic value of Greenland but also the right of its people to determine their own future. In my conversations with legislative colleagues, it's clear that any suggestion of annexation would face significant pushback. NATO is built on principles that respect borders, sovereignty, and democratic governance, and that should never change.
The Real Geopolitical Landscape
The stakes are high; if Greenland's importance in Arctic security is to be recognized, then the West must invest in its protection collectively. Yes, Greenland is critical not only to Denmark but to global security as a whole. This fact cannot be ignored. We, in Denmark, recognize the real threats in the Arctic: should any hostile nation, be it Russia or China, engage in nuclear aggression, Greenland plays a crucial role in defense. This revelation should guide our collective actions toward bolstering security in this vital area.
A New Path Forward
Our history of collaboration with the United States in Arctic security is robust—dating back over 70 years. The 1951 agreement between our nations remains a solid framework for ongoing cooperation, ensuring that we can tailor our military investments to face contemporary challenges together. Denmark has announced plans to invest nearly $14 billion in upgrading our military capabilities, including essential defense mechanisms aimed at securing the Arctic region.
- Recent investments include:
- F-35 jets and advanced ships.
- Long-range and medium-range missile defenses.
- Enhanced Arctic surveillance capabilities.
This comprehensive strategy encapsulates Denmark's resolve to lead in Arctic security. We are not passive bystanders but active participants, eager to contribute to the safety and security of our allies.
Time to Unite
It's no secret that our greatest adversaries, such as Russia and China, thrive when they see division among us. Therefore, now is the time for NATO allies to come together, strengthen our commitments, and engage in open dialogues on security collaborations—without threatening the sovereignty of individual nations. It's imperative that we articulate a united stance against any claim that lacks legitimacy.
We must remain resolute that discussions on security can be open, engaging, and serious; however, territorial assertions between allies should simply not be a part of that conversation. Cooperation, yes; division, absolutely not.
Looking Ahead
As a Danish citizen and member of Parliament, I urge the international community to respect not only our sovereign rights but also the rights of Greenlanders to self-determination. Let's work collaboratively to secure our Arctic interests without undermining each other. In doing so, we empower both our nations and the people of Greenland to navigate the complexities of today's global landscape without fear of aggression or territorial ambition from allies.
Conclusion
Our future in global security is intertwined, and the stakes couldn't be higher. By coming together to fortify our defenses and engage in constructive dialogue, we can ensure a more secure Arctic for not just our respective nations but for the world at large. The strength of NATO lies in its unity; together, we are stronger.
Source reference: https://www.nytimes.com/2026/01/11/opinion/greenland-denmark-trump-nato.html




