The Growing Trend of Election Freebies
Freebies have become a powerful tool in India's political arena, often swaying electoral outcomes. With politicians dishing out everything from household goods to cash, the line between welfare programs and electoral tactics is increasingly blurred.
In the wake of Bihar's recent electoral success for Prime Minister Narendra Modi's alliance, which saw a cash transfer of ₹10,000 (approximately $112) to women, we must consider the ramifications of these strategies. This tactic evidently garnered a significant voter turnout among women, raising questions about the ethical implications of such financial incentives.
Welfare or Wasteful Populism?
While some economists, like Jean Drèze, advocate for these handouts as necessary for the disenfranchised to extract promises from their leaders, others argue they compromise fiscal responsibility. Critically, Modi himself has warned against the "revdi culture," a term that belittles free distribution as akin to handing out sweets.
"Welfare programs must be carefully managed; otherwise, they do more harm than good," asserts Drèze. "Ultimately, handouts should empower change, not entrench dependency."
The Financial Burden of Freebies
Bihar's financial landscape paints a troubling picture, currently dealing with a staggering 6% fiscal deficit against its GDP. Despite these figures, state governments are liberal with their election promises, sometimes accounting for up to 4% of GDP in pre-election schemes. This is a classic case of short-term gain overshadowing long-term fiscal health.
Surprising Support from Economists
Notably, economists like those at Emkay Global suggest that even regions traditionally recognized for prudent budgeting are succumbing to the allure of populist spending to secure votes. With as many as 21 out of 29 states exceeding the 3% deficit ceiling mandated to control unsustainable expenditure, this trend highlights an alarming shift.
Central Bank Concerns
The Reserve Bank of India's recent report underscores the growing caution surrounding this trend. It emphasizes that while overall state debt has decreased to about 28.5% of GDP, the burden from increased subsidies remains a point of contention. They are calling for states to rationalize spending in favor of more productive expenditures that foster growth.
Looking Ahead: A Political Race to the Bottom?
This election cycle is set against a backdrop of intensive competition, with states like Tamil Nadu and Kerala preparing for polls in the coming year. If Bihar is any indication, we may witness a cascading effect, as the promise of cash transfers and subsidies drive political agendas across the nation.
In conclusion, as we continue to dissect these election strategies, it's vital to question not just their immediate impact but the long-term implications they have on civic accountability and fiscal integrity. As responsible citizens, we cannot afford to overlook the potential consequences of electing for short-term gains while compromising the economic future of our states.
Source reference: https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cjd0m874g05o




