Baseball's Unique Flaws
As the sun sets on the 2025 World Series, I'm compelled to emphasize a bittersweet truth: this championship marks the last hurrah for the human touch in officiating. The Automated Ball-Strike (A.B.S.) system, often referred to as the 'robot ump,' is on the horizon, set to debut for the 2026 season. This technological shift promises increased accuracy but also threatens baseball's rich tapestry woven with errors and moments of human frailty.
"In a game where failure is commonplace, why strip it of its imperfections?"
The Impending Transition
The A.B.S. will allow teams to dispute calls, ushering in a new paradigm of decision-making in a game that is celebrated for its inherent unpredictability. Yet, there's a fundamental issue to ponder: will this system enhance or undermine the sport we revere? The beauty of baseball has not solely been about win-loss records but about the memories forged through mishaps and errors.
Historically, baseball thrives on the unexpected—think of Derek Jeter's miraculous flips and Willie Mays' legendary over-the-shoulder catch. These moments are etched into our collective memory, serving to highlight the organic, messy nature of the game. The quirks and flaws breathe life into every game, reaching into the hearts of players and fans alike.
User Experience vs. Technological Precision
It's imperative to recognize that accuracy may not equate to a better game. When I spoke with Morgan Sword, M.L.B.'s executive vice president of baseball operations, he expressed surprise at the backlash against fully automated balls and strikes from players. There's a palpable concern that technology may strip away the essential humanity from baseball.
“We live in an era of the glorification of, 'We can explain everything,'” Sword noted. Yet, the essence of baseball lies in its refusal to conform to rationality. From the infamous midges in Cleveland during the 2007 playoff game to the pebble that diverted critical ground balls in 1924, baseball is a reminder that control is but an illusion.
Lessons in Grace and Humanity
The robustness of the human element is beautifully encapsulated in stories like that of Jim Joyce, the infamous umpire who mistakenly called the last out during Armando Galarraga's near-perfect game. The human emotions involved transcended the error, morphing a botched call into a profound moment of respect and camaraderie.
When I pressed Anette Hosoi, co-founder of the M.I.T. Sports Lab, she shared an evocative insight: “If we're perfect all the time, the game becomes boring.” Here lies an ironic truth: our desire for precision may mitigate the sheer thrill of watching a game unfold in disarray.
What Lies Ahead
The A.B.S. will introduce a new strike zone defined by statistical precision, taking into account a player's height from spring training. As players adapt to this paradigm shift, we must question whether it will enhance their excitement in the game or lead to a lackluster experience devoid of those glorious anomalies.
The implementation of the automated system creates a dichotomy between tradition and modernity in baseball. As we navigate this extensive cultural shift, we must understand that technology holds both promise and peril. The challenge will be finding a balance that honors the game's time-honored quirks alongside new advancements.
“Our game is unpredictable in a good way,” reminisces former Yankees manager Joe Torre. “The unexpected happens,” he asserts with conviction.
A Call to Action
As we gear up for what will be the end of an era, I urge my fellow baseball lovers to cherish the fleeting beauty inherent in imperfection. The upcoming season will undoubtedly be a monumental leap toward the future of officiating, but I implore us to remember that it is our emotional connection to the human narratives in baseball that ultimately resonate the most.
So this World Series, pay close attention to the calls made, the errors committed, and the stories that emerge. They weave our shared experience and challenge us to appreciate the human touch that defines this beautiful, chaotic game we love so dearly.
Source reference: https://www.nytimes.com/2025/10/24/opinion/world-series-robo-umpires.html




