When Health Care Becomes a Profit Center
Health insurance in America isn't built to help you — it's built to make money. That may sound harsh, but it's not an indictment of individual intentions or malice. Instead, it reflects how the system's architecture inherently prioritizes financial outcomes over health outcomes.
When I talk to people about their healthcare experiences, I hear stories that echo a common thread: confusion, frustration, and a sense of being manipulated by an opaque system. The average person spends hours on hold trying to get insurance coverage approved. They are denied claims they believe they've earned. And worst of all, the cost of maintaining that system continues to rise, while the value delivered to patients decreases.
"The system does not need bad people to produce bad outcomes. It only needs misaligned incentives."
This is where we must start. The core problem isn't that insurers are dishonest or hospitals are heartless — it's that our economic model has made profit a primary driver of care delivery, rather than health itself.
The Core Design Flaw
At its essence, the American healthcare system is a business model wrapped in a safety net. It manages risk, controls costs, and generates returns — all while pretending it's about people's wellbeing. The patient is expected to navigate that machinery when they're sick, frightened, or exhausted.
This fundamental mismatch between the provider's responsibility and the patient's needs creates an environment where financial outcomes win out over clinical ones. An executive gets rewarded for financial performance, a hospital must protect its margins, and physicians are incentivized to increase patient volume — all of which can be rational decisions on their own, but collectively create a system that rewards financial efficiency more reliably than health.
It's not about evil. It's about the architecture of how we've structured our financial incentives.
The Economics Behind the System
If you think about it from a purely economic standpoint, the system is built to grow revenue even as care is rationed. KFF reports that under the Affordable Care Act, insurers in large-group markets must spend at least 85% of premiums on medical care and quality improvement. But the incentive remains for insurers to manage their enormous healthcare spending pools — if the pie grows, so do the returns.
That's why American families are paying record amounts for health coverage. Reuters reported that employer-sponsored family coverage reached nearly $27,000 in 2025, with workers contributing an average of $6,850. Meanwhile, 100 million adults are carrying medical or dental debt, according to Forbes. It's a strange paradox — we pay thousands for access to care, yet we're afraid to use it because of the potential bill.
Healthcare becomes not just a service but a conveyor belt of red tape. Doctors are pushed to see more patients, staff burn out, and patients receive less time and more bureaucracy. Prior authorization alone consumes an average of 13 hours per week for physicians and staff, with 95% of doctors saying it delays necessary care, according to the American Medical Association.
How This Impacts Us All
The consequences ripple far beyond the hospital walls. A parent who decides whether to take their child to the ER based on cost isn't just making a personal healthcare decision — they're making a financial one. A worker who delays treatment is not only risking their health but also affecting productivity and workplace performance.
Multiply those decisions across millions of families, and you get an economic issue, a workforce challenge, and ultimately a societal problem. Healthcare is no longer just about treating illness; it's about preserving economic stability, social mobility, and human dignity.
Can We Build a Better System?
I believe there are two futures available to us: one where complexity is profitable, and sickness keeps the financial engine running — or another where efficiency is profitable, and health powers the system forward. The second is not only possible but necessary.
The first step toward that future must be transparency — not just another government webpage with fine print, but genuine clarity in pricing, reimbursement structures, denials, and billing logic. Insurers and providers should be required to make this information accessible to the people who finance their operations. Employers need better visibility into how their healthcare dollars are spent, and patients must have enough insight to question prices before they're hit with bills.
Transparency alone won't fix everything — but it's a necessary foundation for accountability and reform. The measure of any healthcare system should not be how efficiently it moves money or manages treatment rounds, but whether people actually get healthier and can seek help without calculating the financial consequences.
Why This Matters
We are not just talking about health insurance here — we're discussing a fundamental shift in how we structure our society's values. We must demand a system where health outcomes, not profits, are the driving force. We need to move away from a model where being sick is profitable and toward one where being healthy is.
That's the standard we deserve — and it's a standard worth fighting for.
Key Facts
- Author: Joshua Resnikoff
- Article Title: Health Insurance Isn't Built to Help You — It's Built to Profit
- Publication: Newsweek
- Topic: Healthcare system design and profit incentives
- Main Argument: Health insurance in America is structured around financial incentives rather than patient outcomes
- Key Quote: "The system does not need bad people to produce bad outcomes. It only needs misaligned incentives."
- Employer Coverage Cost: Nearly $27,000 per year in 2025
- Average Worker Contribution: $6,850 toward premiums
Background
The article examines how the U.S. healthcare system is structured around financial incentives rather than patient health outcomes. Joshua Resnikoff argues that this business model creates confusion, frustration, and inefficiency for patients while prioritizing profit over care quality. The piece discusses how insurance companies are incentivized to manage healthcare spending pools rather than focus on patient health, leading to increased costs and reduced access to necessary care.
Quick Answers
- Who is Joshua Resnikoff?
- Joshua Resnikoff is the founder of Sunstone Health, an AI-powered precision health platform aimed at reducing diagnostic time for genetic conditions.
- What is the main argument of the article?
- Health insurance in America is built to make money rather than help patients, with financial incentives driving system design over health outcomes.
- When was employer-sponsored family coverage reported at nearly $27,000?
- Employer-sponsored family coverage reached nearly $27,000 per year in 2025 according to Reuters reporting.
- What is the primary issue with the American healthcare system?
- The American healthcare system is designed around financial incentives rather than patient outcomes, creating a business model that prioritizes profit over health.
- How much do workers contribute on average toward premiums?
- Workers contribute an average of $6,850 toward employer-sponsored family coverage premiums in 2025.
- What does the article say about prior authorization?
- Prior authorization consumes an average of 13 hours per week for physicians and staff, with 95% of doctors saying it delays necessary care.
- How many Americans are reported to have medical or dental debt?
- According to Forbes, 100 million American adults report current medical or dental debt.
- What is the author's proposed solution?
- The author believes transparency is the first step toward reform, requiring insurers and providers to make rates, reimbursement structures, denials, and billing logic genuinely understandable to those financing them.
Frequently Asked Questions
Why does health insurance prioritize profits over patient care?
The healthcare system is built around financial incentives where executives are rewarded for financial performance, hospitals must protect margins, and physicians are pushed to increase patient volume.
What problems arise from the current healthcare system design?
Current design creates confusion, frustration, increased costs, reduced access to care, staff burnout, and delays in necessary medical treatment due to administrative burdens.
How does the Affordable Care Act affect insurance companies?
The Affordable Care Act requires insurers in large-group markets to spend at least 85% of premium dollars on medical care and quality improvement, but financial incentives still drive management of healthcare spending pools.
What are the consequences of the current system?
Consequences include economic issues, workforce challenges, societal problems, and parents or workers making healthcare decisions based on cost rather than need.
Source reference: https://www.newsweek.com/health-insurance-isnt-built-to-help-you-opinion-12437734





Comments
Sign in to leave a comment
Sign InLoading comments...