When History Becomes a Vacuum
I am not here to make excuses for Hollywood's silence in the wake of September 11, 2001. I am here to ask why, in the quarter-century since that day, we have been denied films that grapple with the magnitude of what happened, and why we've allowed the narrative to be filled by those who are not telling the truth at all.
The Weight of Memory
As a historian, I know that memory is not just personal—it is cultural. It is shaped by the stories we tell ourselves. For decades, American cinema was a powerful vehicle for processing trauma, shaping identity, and defining national values. Think about it: World War II was reimagined through Saving Private Ryan, Vietnam through Apocalypse Now, the Civil War through Glory. These weren't just movies—they were cultural touchstones that helped us understand ourselves and our place in history.
"The last feature film on 9/11 was made over a decade ago, with none currently in the pipeline."
And yet, as we approach the anniversary of the attacks that changed everything, Hollywood has largely turned away. The rare exceptions—Oliver Stone's World Trade Center, Paul Greengrass' United 93—are not enough. They are not enough because they do not tell us what we need to know about why the attacks happened and how we responded.
Why the Silence?
There are reasons, of course. Some blame political correctness or the so-called DEI mindset, suggesting that Hollywood fears being labeled Islamophobic by depicting Muslims in a negative light. Others point to the postmodernist rejection of direct engagement with hard truths, or the global nature of modern film financing, where investors from countries hostile to Western values have little incentive to promote stories that might not align with their own agendas.
But these explanations don't go far enough. The real issue is deeper—much deeper. It's about our collective responsibility as artists and storytellers to grapple with the defining moments of our time, not to shy away from them.
The Cost of Disengagement
When Hollywood fails to confront difficult truths, it doesn't just lose its power to move us—it loses its ability to protect us. The result is a culture that is increasingly confused, divided, and vulnerable. Look at what has happened in the years since 9/11: we've seen the rise of conspiracy theories from Alex Jones to Candace Owens, fueled by a lack of meaningful narratives about our past.
We knew the Nazis were evil because Hollywood told us so for decades. We understood the stakes of war and freedom through films that asked hard questions, even when those questions challenged the status quo. But now, as we face new threats, both domestic and global, we are left with nothing but speculation and sensationalism.
When Hollywood Fails to Lead
What's more, many of today's Hollywood filmmakers—those who have made their names advocating for various causes—have chosen to support the current Palestinian narrative instead of focusing on the real lessons from 9/11. This isn't about being anti-Israel or pro-Palestinian—it's about prioritizing ideology over history, and that is a betrayal of our own national identity.
The same artists who once celebrated the courage of American heroes have now become advocates for regimes that share the same extremist ideologies that destroyed our World Trade Center. It's an abdication of their duty as cultural leaders, and it makes us all less safe.
Can We Reclaim Our Story?
There is hope, however. The very technology that now enables cheap, ambitious storytelling also opens new possibilities for narrative redemption. A bold, well-crafted film—perhaps one that captures the complexity of the events and their aftermath—could serve as a beacon for the next generation. We don't need another blockbuster; we need another Casablanca. We need a story that helps us understand not just what happened, but why it matters now.
Our democracy depends on it. Our safety depends on it. And our future, as a people, depends on it too.
The Time for Silence Is Over
Hollywood must stop hiding behind the veil of sensitivity and start telling the truth. It's time to face 9/11 with honesty, integrity, and courage. Because if we don't, the vacuum will only grow, and so will the danger.
Key Facts
- Article title: Hollywood's Silence on 9/11: A Cultural Betrayal
- Author: Asaf Romirowsky
- Publication date: September 8, 2026
- Primary topic: Hollywood's lack of 9/11 films
- Historical context: Twenty-five years after the September 11, 2001 attacks
- Main argument: Hollywood's silence on 9/11 has created a vacuum filled by conspiracy theorists
- Key films mentioned: World Trade Center and United 93
- Last feature film on 9/11: Made over a decade ago
Background
Asaf Romirowsky, an historian and executive director of ASMEA and SPME, argues that Hollywood's absence from the 9/11 narrative has created a dangerous vacuum. He notes that while American cinema has historically processed trauma through films like Saving Private Ryan and Casablanca, major motion pictures addressing 9/11 have been rare. The article suggests this silence has contributed to an increase in conspiracy theories and a weakening of American cultural identity.
Quick Answers
- Who is Asaf Romirowsky?
- Asaf Romirowsky is the author of the article and executive director of the Association for the Study of the Middle East and Africa (ASMEA) and Scholars for Peace in the Middle East (SPME).
- What happened to Hollywood's 9/11 films?
- Hollywood has largely failed to produce serious films about 9/11, with the last feature film on the subject made over a decade ago and none currently in development.
- When was this article published?
- This article was published on September 8, 2026.
- Why is Hollywood's silence on 9/11 significant?
- Hollywood's silence on 9/11 has created a vacuum filled by conspiracy theorists and ideological extremes, according to the article.
Frequently Asked Questions
What films have been made about 9/11?
The rare exceptions mentioned in the article include Oliver Stone's World Trade Center and Paul Greengrass' United 93.
Why does the author think Hollywood should make 9/11 films?
The author believes that Hollywood's failure to confront difficult truths about 9/11 has weakened American culture and made people more vulnerable to conspiracy theories.
What is the author's main argument?
The author argues that Hollywood's silence in the wake of September 11, 2001, has created a dangerous vacuum filled by conspiracy theorists and ideological extremes.
How does the author compare 9/11 to other historical events in film?
The author compares 9/11 to other significant historical events like World War II, Vietnam, and the Civil War, which were processed through films that helped Americans understand themselves and their place in history.
Source reference: https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/twenty-five-years-later-hollywood-giving-9-11-silent-treatment-making-us-less-safe





Comments
Sign in to leave a comment
Sign InLoading comments...