Introduction
As I settled into the audience of Marjorie Prime at the Helen Hayes Theater, I felt a familiar pulse—a mixture of nostalgia and excitement. Jordan Harrison's exploration of grief and technology takes on a new timeliness in our A.I.-charged world. June Squibb, stepping into the titular role, brings an intricacy that asks not just whether an A.I. can replicate love, but whether it can shoulder the burden of loss.
The Premise
At its core, Marjorie Prime revolves around the use of A.I. recreations, or “Primes,” which are designed to resemble loved ones who have passed away. As the narrative unfolds, we see 85-year-old Marjorie converse with a younger version of her deceased husband, Walter, played by Christopher Lowell. This technology offers Marjorie a temporary respite from her solitude, but the play quickly questions the ethical and emotional ramifications of such companionship.
“If companionship is 'better than television,' as the company claims, how do we measure the value of human interaction against that?”
Revisiting Familiar Territory
Much of the script remains unchanged from its 2015 Off-Broadway run, yet its relevance has notably evolved. In our current climate, where A.I. influences various facets of life, Harrison's narrative resonates deeply. What was once speculation feels like a reflection of our present realities. Senior Serenity, the fictional company behind these Primes, argues that their services could mend the cracks created by grief.
A Subtle Shift in Performance
June Squibb's performance expertly aligns with this theme. Where Lois Smith, who originated the role, approached Marjorie with quiet fragility, Squibb adds a playful yet sorrowful nuance—almost flirtatious, as if teasing the very boundaries of her character's mortality. This balancing act gives the play a freshness that speaks to the complexities of human emotion.
The Family Dynamic
Supporting her are Cynthia Nixon as Tess, Marjorie's daughter, and Danny Burstein as her husband, Jon. Their relationship is fraught with the tensions of grief and acceptance, presenting contrasting views on whether A.I. can genuinely replace the lost. Tess, bitter and protective, operates as a harbinger of skepticism, while Jon's steady disposition offers a glimmer of hope. This family dynamic fuels the narrative, presenting a multifaceted inquiry into the efficacy of A.I. in fulfilling emotional needs.
A Cultural Context
In our modern landscape, where tech firms promise emotional support through platforms like HereAfter and documentaries such as Eternal You, the themes in Marjorie Prime feel immediate. The resonance of a play initially deemed a speculative evaluation now feels more like a cautionary tale, enriching its narrative depth.
Metaphysical Questions
I found myself pondering, how far can we take our quest for connection? When do Primes stop being mere reflections and start embodying the essence of humanity? The show cleverly plays with the Eliza effect, where virtual interactions evoke human traits, pushing us to consider when simulation crosses into substance.
“More human,” a Prime innocently states, suggesting that knowledge is the key to emotional elevation. But what does it mean to be 'more human'?
Conclusion: The Landscape Ahead
As the final scenes of Marjorie Prime unfold, I was struck by the unsettling beauty of its resolution. Each character, through their connections—real or replicated—finds a semblance of wholeness, leading us to ask: in a world dominated by technology, can we still cherish authentic human interactions? Harrison and director Anne Kauffman deftly guide us through this delicate exploration, leaving me wondering about the implications for our collective future.
Marjorie Prime
Through Feb. 15 at the Helen Hayes Theater, Manhattan; 2st.com. Running time: 1 hour 15 minutes.
Source reference: https://www.nytimes.com/2025/12/08/theater/marjorie-prime-review-june-squibb.html
