Trust in the Media: A Growing Concern
In today's fragmented media landscape, trust is a rare commodity. The DealBook Summit hosted a crucial conversation where veteran journalists and rising media figures confronted the stark reality of public skepticism towards news outlets. Participants explored the erosion of media credibility exacerbated by political figures like former President Donald Trump, who has often positioned himself against the press, leading many to question the integrity of journalistic practices.
The Panel Discussion: Voices of Experience and Skepticism
The panel, moderated by Michael Barbaro from The New York Times, included notable figures like David Remnick, Amna Nawaz, and Ben Shapiro, each providing diverse perspectives shaped by their backgrounds and experiences. Remnick highlighted Trump's influence, comparing his aggressive tactics to the repressive journalism standards seen in authoritarian regimes. Nawaz echoed these concerns, drawing parallels from her work in countries where press freedom is nonexistent, emphasizing the alarming nature of such threats.
“If you're not taking what Donald Trump is doing seriously...then you're not watching and you're not listening,” - David Remnick
However, some panelists, particularly from the new media sphere, approached the subject differently. Shapiro argued that the decline in trust predated Trump's presidency, rooted instead in long-standing perceptions of bias within mainstream journalism. He likened the current sentiment towards the media to viewing Trump as a “coroner,” suggesting that the journalism industry had already suffered significant damage before his administration.
New Media vs. Legacy Journalism
The discussion highlighted a generational divide, with newer voices like podcaster Andrew Schulz emphasizing the sensationalism endemic in traditional media and the role social media plays in fragmenting audiences. He mentioned how algorithmically-driven platforms often prioritize sensational content, leading to divisive narratives and distrust.
Changing Dynamics of Credibility
In response to the varied perceptions around credibility, Nawaz and others pointed out the wealth of reliable journalism now available across multiple platforms. Nawaz observed, “This is an extraordinary time for smart, credible, trustworthy journalism,” a stark contrast to earlier decades where audiences had limited sources to choose from.
Key Takeaways from the Summit
- Despite the abundance of news sources, audiences struggle to discern which outlets they can trust.
- The media's collective identity is too broad, complicating discussions about trust.
- While Trump's threats to the media are serious, opinions on their relative impact vary.
Looking Ahead: The Path to Rekindling Trust
As we navigate through these complex dynamics, it's essential to consider what can be done to restore faith in journalism. The consensus suggests that a more transparent approach, where journalists explicitly acknowledge their biases, could help rebuild credibility. Media organizations must strive to present facts while articulating viewpoints, fostering a better-informed public.
“What we're doing is fundamentally different. We have a duty to remove whatever our personal biases are.” - Amna Nawaz
In closing, the exploration of media trust at the DealBook Summit underscores a pressing challenge faced by the industry. Moving forward, both legacy and new media must align their practices to serve a public that is increasingly demanding clarity, integrity, and accountability from their news sources.
Source reference: https://www.nytimes.com/2025/12/10/business/dealbook/media-task-force-trust-biases.html




