Newsclip — Social News Discovery

Editorial

Netanyahu's Illusion: Unpacking Trump's Dismantling of Gaza Strategy

October 12, 2025
  • #MiddleEast
  • #PeaceProcess
  • #Gaza
  • #Netanyahu
  • #Trump
  • #InvestigativeJournalism
Share on XShare on FacebookShare on LinkedIn
Netanyahu's Illusion: Unpacking Trump's Dismantling of Gaza Strategy

The Unmasking of a Delusional 'Victory'

As I delve into the intricacies of the recent peace plan supported by former President Trump, it's impossible to overlook the uncomfortable truths it reveals about Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's agenda. Advertised as a strategic victory, this deal starkly contradicts the core tenets of Netanyahu's administration—namely the total defeat of Hamas and the establishment of a secure Israel without compromise.

“There's no phase two. That's clear to everyone, right?”—Amit Segal

The cease-fire reached between Israel and Hamas does mark a pivotal moment, but it signals more than mere diplomacy; it underscores a retreat from the all-or-nothing stance Netanyahu has clung to since taking office. The Israeli government, for all its proclamations of triumph, has its hands tied by the realities on the ground—realities that contradict the promises of eternal victory and the obliteration of Hamas as a political entity.

A Plan Built on Missed Opportunities

The peace deal includes a hostage swap and a ceasefire, yet avoids addressing fundamental issues, such as the complete withdrawal of Israeli forces from Gaza. Drawn up under the auspices of U.S. leadership, the plan is riddled with the contradictions that have plagued Israeli governance for decades. Netanyahu has historically rejected negotiations with Hamas, labeling anything less than complete military victory as a form of surrender. But now, the deal has forced him into a corner.

  • Under the agreement, Israel retains military presence in Gaza.
  • It promotes humanitarian aid but fails to establish a tangible pathway to Palestinian self-determination.
  • No conclusive plan addresses the future governance of Gaza.

These terms are not just politically uncomfortable; they represent a fundamental defeat of the administration's earlier, messianic aspirations.

Hamas: The Uninvited Guest

The persistence of Hamas, which was initially framed as a group poised for disarmament, continues to present a major obstacle to peace. Contrary to Netanyahu's claims of wiping out the organization, it appears set to retain a foothold in Gaza. Evidence suggests that as soon as Israeli troops withdraw, Hamas will reassert its authority and continue governing its territory effectively. This harsh reality illustrates a failure of strategic foresight that has longstanding implications for both Israeli and Palestinian populations.

The hard truth is that Hamas has become an integral part of Palestinian society, a development that was unanticipated by Israeli policymakers. The decades of neglect and mismanagement have allowed Hamas to flourish, evolving from an insurgent group into a governing entity with complex political relations.

Revisiting the Promises of the Past

For too long, Netanyahu and his administration have perpetuated the myth of a utopian Israel built upon the demise of Hamas. The recent developments make it evident that this vision was ultimately flawed, leaving in its wake a cycle of violence and political stagnation. The so-called victory he is trying to sell to his base is built on a shaky foundation—one that prioritizes denial over accountability.

The peace plan's ultimate goals stand in stark contrast to the promises made by the Israeli government, wherein the narrative of total victory has crumbled into a messy negotiation that resurrects many ideas Netanyahu has opposed throughout his political career.

Conclusion: The Path Forward

Looking ahead, it is essential for Israeli leadership to reconcile its past rhetoric with the on-the-ground realities of Gaza. Acknowledging the complexities of this conflict will require courage and a willingness to engage in meaningful dialogue with all stakeholders, including those currently marginalized. The fragile cease-fire may bring temporary relief, but it certainly does not ensure long-lasting peace. It's clear that the old guard's strategies need to evolve if we are to prevent future bloodshed and lead the region towards a sustainable resolution.

Source reference: https://www.nytimes.com/2025/10/12/opinion/israel-palestinians-gaza-netanyahu-peace-deal.html

More from Editorial