The Foundation of Learning
Education should be more than a pathway to test scores; it should be a gateway to human flourishing. Yet in the pursuit of academic metrics, we have systematically undervalued the arts. My experience as an educator has taught me that the classroom is not merely a place for facts and figures—it's where young minds develop empathy, resilience, and creativity. The arts are not extracurricular luxuries; they are fundamental to how children understand themselves and their world.
"The arts offer something essential: a reason to believe they belong in education at all."
In a recent letter to the Guardian, Pete Crockett, former headteacher, eloquently captured this sentiment. He recounts how drama helped students with special needs find confidence and connection, transforming lives in ways that no standardized test could ever measure. These stories should be at the heart of our policy discussions—not dismissed as irrelevant anecdotes.
The Tragic Decline of Arts Education
Michael Gove's education reforms, with their myopic focus on core academic subjects and league tables, have decimated the arts curriculum in countless schools. The English Baccalaureate, meant to promote rigorous learning, instead created an environment where creativity was marginalized. Schools, facing pressure to boost test results, made difficult choices—and they often chose quantity over quality, measurable outcomes over meaningful experiences.
But what happens when students lose access to music and drama? They don't just lose subjects; they lose pieces of themselves. For many, the arts are not merely optional—it's their language of expression. When we deny that access, we deny them a voice.
Where Are the Resources?
There is a clear gap between the stated value of arts education and its practical implementation. The newly announced National Centre for Arts and Music Education may be well-intentioned, but with only £13 million in funding over three years, it's a drop in the ocean. Delays in opening, lack of transparency in leadership, and inconsistent support from the Department for Education signal deeper systemic issues.
This isn't just about money—it's about commitment. The DfE should be held accountable for treating the arts as an essential part of education, not as a side note. If we truly want to reverse the trend of elitism in education, we must ensure that every child, regardless of background, has access to world-class arts programs.
The Geographic Divide
Molly Stubbs' story exemplifies the geographic inequality plaguing arts education. She travels hours each day just to attend a state school offering drama and textiles A-levels—a luxury most students simply cannot afford. Her determination to pursue a career in costume design speaks volumes about the passion many young people harbor, but their dreams are constantly hindered by infrastructure failures.
Small towns and rural communities shouldn't be denied opportunities based on geography or finances. When schools drop key arts subjects due to low enrollment, they fail both students and society. The result is a generation of young people told they're not creative enough—when the real problem lies in their lack of access to creative outlets.
Reclaiming Our Cultural Heritage
Matthew Parris, who leads a school that has long championed the performing arts, points out an alarming trend: students from state schools who go on to conservatoires or music degrees are often the only ones in their cohort from the public sector. This disparity is not just unfair—it's dangerous for our cultural landscape.
If we want our future to reflect the diversity of our society, we must invest in all children, especially those whose paths lead away from traditional academic tracks. The arts give voice to the unheard, and that's a responsibility we cannot shirk.
A Call to Action
Andy Burnham and his team at the Department for Education must act now. Arts funding should not be treated as an afterthought in budget negotiations. It is critical infrastructure for a healthy, creative society. We need policy changes that prioritize access over performance metrics, equity over elitism.
The time has come to stop seeing arts education as optional or supplementary. It is foundational. The future of our nation depends on nurturing not just smart children, but thoughtful, empathetic ones—children who can imagine and create a better world.
- Support the National Centre for Arts and Music Education with adequate funding
- Reintroduce arts subjects as mandatory components in all state schools
- Ensure equal access to music and drama regardless of geography or economic status
- Provide training and resources for teachers to implement high-quality arts programs
We must reframe the conversation around arts education from one of cost to one of value. It's not about spending more—it's about spending wisely, with intentionality, and with courage.
Key Facts
- Primary Entity: The Arts in Schools: A Right, Not a Privilege
- Article Category: Editorial
- Reference URL: https://www.theguardian.com/education/2026/sep/09/an-education-in-the-arts-should-be-available-to-all
- Author ID: 3
- Publication Date: Wed 9 Sep 2026
Background
The article discusses the declining state of arts education in English schools, emphasizing that music and drama programs are being marginalized due to policy shifts and funding constraints. It highlights how these subjects contribute significantly to student development and societal diversity. The piece responds to an editorial calling for Andy Burnham to address pressure on arts funding in English schools, featuring letters from various contributors who share their perspectives on the importance of accessible arts education.
Quick Answers
- What is the main argument of the article?
- The main argument is that arts education should be recognized as a fundamental right, not a privilege, and that it plays a crucial role in student development and societal diversity.
- Who is Pete Crockett?
- Pete Crockett is a former headteacher who emphasizes the transformative impact of drama on students with special needs and the importance of arts education for building confidence and empathy.
- What happened to the National Centre for Arts and Music Education?
- The National Centre for Arts and Music Education has faced delays in opening, lacks transparency in leadership, and has only £13 million in funding over three years.
- What is Molly Stubbs' situation?
- Molly Stubbs travels four hours daily to attend a state school that offers drama and textiles A-levels, highlighting the geographic inequality in arts education access.
- Why is Matthew Parris significant in this context?
- Matthew Parris leads a school that champions performing arts and notes that students from state schools who pursue conservatoires or music degrees are often the only ones in their cohort from the public sector.
- What does the article suggest about Michael Gove's reforms?
- The article suggests that Michael Gove's education reforms, with their focus on core academic subjects and league tables, have decimated arts curriculum in countless schools by marginalizing creativity.
- What role does Andy Burnham play in this discussion?
- Andy Burnham is mentioned as the figure who must act on arts funding in English schools, with his team at the Department for Education being responsible for policy changes that prioritize access over performance metrics.
- How does the article describe the value of arts education?
- The article describes arts education as essential for identity, belonging, and opportunity, providing a reason to believe students belong in education at all, rather than being viewed as a luxury.
Frequently Asked Questions
What are the key concerns about arts education in schools?
Key concerns include the marginalization of music and drama due to policy shifts, geographic inequality, lack of adequate funding, and systemic failures that deny students access to creative outlets.
How does the article propose to address the decline in arts education?
The article proposes support for the National Centre for Arts and Music Education with adequate funding, reintroducing arts subjects as mandatory components in all state schools, ensuring equal access regardless of geography or economic status, and providing training and resources for teachers.
What is the significance of the National Centre for Arts and Music Education?
The National Centre for Arts and Music Education is seen as a potential solution but has faced delays in opening, lacks transparency in leadership, and has only £13 million in funding over three years, which is insufficient to address the systemic issues.
How does geography impact access to arts education?
Geographic inequality impacts access to arts education as students in small towns or rural communities must travel long distances to attend schools offering drama and textiles A-levels, creating barriers for those who cannot afford such travel.
Source reference: https://www.theguardian.com/education/2026/sep/09/an-education-in-the-arts-should-be-available-to-all





Comments
Sign in to leave a comment
Sign InLoading comments...