When Democracy Becomes a Casualty
I've been watching the political landscape of Europe with growing unease, particularly as far-right parties like Germany's Alternative für Deutschland (AfD) and Britain's Brexit-era populists continue to gain traction. Rafael Behr is absolutely right to sound the alarm about these dangerous trends—Maga ideology, Kremlin influence, and extremist politics threatening the very foundations of liberal democracy. But I believe we must dig deeper than just blaming external actors or ideological fervor. The real roots of this crisis lie in the hollowing out of democratic institutions by those who have long occupied the center.
The Forgotten Fault Lines
Benjamin Selwyn's analysis highlights a crucial oversight: the role of the liberal center in creating conditions that allow the far right to flourish. While Thatcher, Reagan, and their successors dismantled trade unions and weakened collective bargaining power, center-left governments accepted these changes rather than reversing them. Under the banner of the 'third way,' they expanded labor market insecurity, embraced financialization, and allowed private interests to penetrate public services. Social and economic inequality soared—not from a sudden upheaval but through decades of policy choices that prioritized profit over people.
"History suggests the centre will hit the snooze button."
This is not an accident. It's a political failure to acknowledge that inequality breeds resentment, and resentment gives fertile ground for demagogues who promise simple solutions to complex problems. The protests of the anti-globalization movement, the post-2008 anti-austerity demonstrations, even recent pro-Palestinian mobilizations—each was met with increasing policing, surveillance, and legal restrictions by a liberal center desperate to maintain order without addressing underlying grievances.
Germany's Wounded Soul
Dr Michael Esser's reflection on Germany offers a sobering look into how history is often rewritten to serve the interests of the powerful. The postwar consensus in Germany was built not on genuine reconciliation but on top-down moral frameworks designed to appease Europe and maintain stability. The suppression of honest reckoning with Nazi legacy, from the early days of the republic through the 'Historikerstreit' to Goldhagen's controversial work, created a culture of silence that masked structural rot.
Now, in eastern states like Saxony-Anhalt, this system is crumbling under pressure. An ageing population and economic stagnation are straining social safety nets, leaving citizens vulnerable to the seductive narratives of xenophobic nationalism. The AfD isn't an alien force—it's the product of a political establishment that failed to address the deep wounds left by historical trauma and economic dislocation.
The resignation of Friedrich Merz as leader of the CDU may be symbolic, but it represents something far more fundamental: the collapse of trust in mainstream institutions. The AfD isn't just a political party—it's a symptom of a systemic failure that has allowed inequality, misinformation, and political apathy to flourish unchecked.
Why We Can't Ignore the Violence
William Ward raises an important point about public order laws. There is no reason why the Public Order Act 1936—designed to curb the quasi-military demonstrations of Oswald Mosley's blackshirts—cannot be applied to modern far-right activists who use intimidation tactics, face concealment, and physical aggression to disrupt peaceful assemblies. The question isn't whether such laws exist; it's whether they're enforced with sufficient urgency and resolve.
Too often, the response to far-right protests has been one of moral relativism: we must respect all voices, even if some are hateful. But there is a crucial distinction between legitimate protest and organized aggression. When black-clothed demonstrators in Dover or Portsmouth threaten lives, when balaclavas replace faces, when intimidation replaces debate, that's not free speech—it's terrorism.
What Lies Beneath the Surface
We live in a world where the very concept of shared values is under siege. But what I find most unsettling isn't just the rise of extremist rhetoric—it's how the center has abdicated its duty to foster genuine democracy. In failing to address inequality, insecurity, and the erosion of trust in institutions, the liberal establishment has inadvertently paved the way for authoritarianism.
The AfD's electoral success is not a flashpoint but a long overdue reckoning. If mainstream parties continue to ignore the systemic neglect that gave birth to these movements, Europe's democracies will not just lose credibility—they will collapse entirely. The warning signs are clear. The time for action is now.
Reimagining Democratic Renewal
We must ask ourselves: what does it mean to be truly democratic? It means not only respecting individual rights but also ensuring that all citizens have access to the economic and social conditions necessary for participation in civic life. It means recognizing that democracy isn't a spectator sport—it requires engagement, accountability, and constant vigilance.
The far right has seized upon our failures because they know how easily people can be manipulated when their basic needs are ignored and their voices are silenced. The real danger is not the parties themselves but the silence of those who should be defending democratic norms. As I write this, I am haunted by a question: how many more generations will we allow to pass before we finally take responsibility for what we have built—or failed to build?
Key Facts
- Primary Entity: The Rise of the Far Right: A Systemic Crisis in Europe
- Authors: Benjamin Selwyn, Dr Michael Esser, William Ward
- Key Party: Alternative für Deutschland (AfD)
- Countries Mentioned: Germany, Britain
- Date of Article: September 13, 2026
- Publication: The Guardian
- Key Law Mentioned: Public Order Act 1936
- Key Event: Friedrich Merz resignation as CDU leader
Background
The article discusses the rise of far-right movements across Europe, particularly in Germany and Britain. It argues that this trend is not merely a political aberration but a symptom of deeper systemic failures within liberal democracies. The piece explores how economic inequality, institutional neglect, and historical trauma have created fertile ground for extremist ideologies to flourish.
Quick Answers
- What is the main topic of the article?
- The rise of the far right in Europe and its connection to systemic democratic failures.
- Who are the authors of this piece?
- Benjamin Selwyn, Dr Michael Esser, and William Ward.
- What is the Alternative für Deutschland party?
- The Alternative für Deutschland (AfD) is a far-right political party in Germany that has gained significant traction in recent years.
- When was this article published?
- The article was published on September 13, 2026.
- What law is mentioned in relation to far-right protests?
- The Public Order Act 1936 is mentioned as a potential tool to address intimidating demonstrations by far-right activists.
- Why is Friedrich Merz mentioned in the article?
- Friedrich Merz's resignation as CDU leader is referenced as symbolizing the collapse of trust in mainstream political institutions.
- What countries are discussed in relation to far-right movements?
- Germany and Britain are the primary countries mentioned in relation to far-right political developments.
- What is the main argument about the liberal center's role?
- The article argues that the liberal center has contributed to the rise of far-right movements by hollowing out democratic institutions and failing to address inequality and economic insecurity.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the Alternative für Deutschland party?
The Alternative für Deutschland (AfD) is a far-right political party in Germany that has gained significant traction in recent years.
Why does the article discuss Friedrich Merz's resignation?
Friedrich Merz's resignation as CDU leader represents a symbolic collapse of trust in mainstream political institutions, according to the article.
What is the Public Order Act 1936 mentioned in the article?
The Public Order Act 1936 is referenced as a historical law that was used to curb quasi-military demonstrations by Oswald Mosley's blackshirts, and is proposed as a potential tool for modern far-right protests.
What role does economic inequality play in the article?
The article argues that decades of economic insecurity, shrinking democratic participation, and declining faith in institutions have created fertile ground for far-right movements to flourish.
How does the article connect historical trauma to current events?
The article suggests that Germany's postwar consensus was built on top-down moral frameworks rather than genuine reconciliation, creating a culture of silence about Nazi legacy that contributed to current political conditions.
What is the main concern raised about far-right movements in Europe?
The main concern is that far-right movements threaten the foundations of liberal democracy and that their rise is not an accident but a result of systemic failures by mainstream political parties.
Source reference: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2026/sep/13/the-far-rights-rise-is-a-wake-up-call-for-europe


Comments
Sign in to leave a comment
Sign InLoading comments...