The Anticipation and the Reality
After the colossal success of the first film, expectations for Wicked: For Good were sky-high. The original enchanted audiences and critics alike, so it's no surprise that the sequel would draw attention. However, upon its release, the reviews came in— and it seems not everyone is under its spell.
The sequel reintroduces us to Cynthia Erivo and Ariana Grande as they slip into the iconic roles of Elphaba and Glinda, but many critics feel the film doesn't quite reach the magical heights set by its predecessor.
Critical Reception: Spells of Mixed Reviews
Across various platforms, critiques are sharply divided. Empire's John Nugent gave the film a three-star rating, summarizing it as "not quite Wicked: For Great." The post-credits vibes and pacing left something to be desired.
In contrast, Total Film's Molly Edwards described it as an "absolute triumph," although she mentioned that it "suffers slightly from thinner source material and weak new songs." This encapsulates the heart of the film's issue: while the performances dazzled, many seemed disappointed by the narrative's substance.
Ariana Grande: The Bright Spot?
Many critics highlighted Ariana Grande's performance. Her ability to infuse fragility into her character earned her high praise. Variety's Peter Debruge remarked on her more nuanced portrayal: "Unlike the first film, where she had a relatively one-dimensional role, Glinda evolves into a multifaceted character this time around." Grande's emotional depth was commended by David Rooney from the Hollywood Reporter, who noted her moments of introspection and anxiety.
However, let's not overshadow the powerhouse that is Erivo. Her vocal prowess remains formidable, bringing emotional intensity that complements her dynamic with Grande. Cinema's reliance on these two actors creates an electric atmosphere despite the film's flaws.
The Critics Speak
“If your complaint about last year's Wicked was that it was so oddly lit that you could barely see what was going on, then fear not – in Wicked: For Good, you won't mind so much, because there's so little to look at.” - Clarisse Loughrey, The Independent
The skepticism isn't unfounded. Many pointed out a lack of engaging visuals and a story that felt too padded for its runtime. Critics like Robbie Collin voiced concerns about the film's pacing, stating, "It doesn't amount to two hours of story — the stage show clips through the same plot in around half the time, and the padding is as obvious as it is exhausting." This criticism resonates with a viewing audience craving substance over spectacle.
Musical Highlights and Misses
Unfortunately, many of Wicked's most memorable songs resided in the first film, leaving the sequel at a disadvantage. As noted by Debruge, "On stage, the second act lacks a song as strong as Defying Gravity." With weaker musical content, the elevating moments simply fall short of their predecessors.
Ultimately, the film captures elements of charm and ambition, yet lacks the vibrancy that charmed viewers the first time around. The sequel's production, while ambitious, sometimes feels lost amidst its grandeur.
Looking Ahead
With Jon M Chu at the helm once again, expectations remain high for future projects. He's anticipated to direct a new film adaptation of Joseph and the Amazing Technicolor Dreamcoat, which may offer fresh narratives and musical delights. As the industry evolves, so does the landscape for musical adaptations, and I can't help but wonder what the future holds for the genres we love.
Conclusion: A Spell Gone Awry?
So, does Wicked: For Good recapture the magic or leave us wanting more? While it brings back beloved characters and familiar faces, the film struggles to evoke the same enchantment that made its forerunner a beloved classic. It's a brave attempt, but ultimately one that may not succeed in casting a spell as strong as before.
Related Articles
Source reference: https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c1m3ddkn3gdo
